Skip to main content

Thoughts on Morals and Computers

Self driving cars consist of software controlling a car.  Facebook consists of many software programs.  Twitter, instagram, Google, Amazon and every other website and app people use are pieces of software written by people.  Software is simply instructions, written by people, telling computers what to do.  For many years I was a computer programmer.  The way the process is supposed to work is that people gather and determine what the end result is supposed to be.  These requirements are then given to programmers who make choices on how to bring about those results.  There are many, sometimes hundreds of choices that a programmer can make on how to bring about the desired results.  

As we enter the realm of “machine learning” or “artificial intelligence” computer programmers, people, will be deciding how to bring about the results that the directors want.  Currently, Facebook has told its users that it will determine what is true news and fake news.  Those choices are being made by programmers.  Therefore, what a programmer thinks is fake news will be reflected in what the program thinks is fake news.  The choices that the Facebook program makes were made by programmers weeks or months or years ago. The Facebook program is so massive, that no one person knows what is going on in it. 

When it comes to self driving cars, the moral question that comes up is this:  What if the car was speeding toward a school bus full of children.  What does the car do?  Does it potentially kill the driver to save the children?  This is a moral choice and a programmer will make that choice prior to the car entering that situation.  The morals of the programmer(s) will be reflected in how the car drives.  Recently a self-driving car crashed.  Right before the crash, the car accelerated.  Why?  The programmer told it to.  Machines only do what programmers tell them to do.

Most people think that things like Facebook and Twitter and self-driving cars are neutral.  That is not true.  Just like a piece of fictional writing will reflect the morals of the author, computer software reflects the world view and morals of the author.  In my worldview, there is only one group of people who have correct morals.  That would be true believing Christians who seek to follow Christ by being very involved in a church and financually supporting the work of God.  Only these people know true morals and only these people have the foundation to back up their belief in those morals.  

In would be illegal for Facebook to ask potential programmers if they are true Christians.  Mark Zuckerberg would not do that anyway, since he beleives that people are basically good and they just need to be guided by a benevolant dictator.  Mark Zuckerberg’s worldview, and the worldview of Facebook is specifically anti-God.  Therefore to think that the people who write Facebook are good wholesome people who have God's best interest in mind is incorrect.  


My point is simply this.  True, eternal, morals come from God.  Righteousness and goodness come from God.  Godless companies who hire godless programmers to write software that you use do not have the best interest of godly people in mind.  Facebook’s ultimate goal is to destroy the Christian worldview.  Therefore use all software with eyes wide open.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering the Franklin Day Planner

This week I have been rereading Hyrum Smith's book "The 10 Natural Laws of Productivity and Happiness." This book was written in the late 1980s and I remember reading it for the first time when I was working at Seagate Technologies, after my time in the Air Force. The core tool talked about in the book is the Franklin Day Planner . I remembering having one such planner, long before smart phones and Palm devices. Mine was a leather bound loose-leaf binder with calendar and note pages in it. I kept my daily tasks list and appointments in that binder, which became a record of my work history at Seagate and beyond. The Day Planner binders, pages and supplies were sold at a store called Franklin Quest , which was located at Valco Mall in Sunnyvale. At that time, I was a computer programmer. I was able to keep a record of all request for software, who made the request and when and what the requirements were. It seemed that I was the only one keeping a record of this b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on the 2017 iPhones

Apple released the iPhone 8 a week or so ago.  Apple will release the iPhone X on November 3, 2017.  This is part of Apple’s current annual release of updated phones with better screens, more battery life and a better processor.  I bought my iPhone 7 plus on release day in September of 2016.  I went to the Apple store and bought it.  When thinking about whether I need to update my phone this year, I need to consider a few things. First, is my phone functional or did I break it?  My phone is in good working order.  The screen is not cracked, the non-existent home button still works.  Volume and power and silent switches work.  Mechanically the phone is in good shape.  It took the IOS 11 and IOS 11.01 updates without a problem. The next question is this:  what do I use my phone for and will a faster phone with a better screen help me do these things? Podcasts:  I listen to many podcasts on my phone.  I listen to a mix ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on the Gap theory

The Bible is a closed book.  When God was done writing the Old Testament, he stopped until Matthew.  When he wrote Revelation, he stopped.  There are warnings in the Bible about adding or subtracting words from the Bible. Deuteronomy 4:2 & 12:32 and Revelation 22:18 are the three most specific.  The idea throughout the Bible is that this book is inspired Scripture and people have no right or authority to add to them or take away. This is why the Gap theory is so strange.  People probably feel it would be too obvious to add 16 extra chapters to Romans or Ephesians, so they try and sneak some extra stuff into Genesis.  That is the Gap Theory. The Gap Theory says that there is a space of time between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2.  The space that some people insert is a couple of hundred years all the way up to billions of years.  The most popular use for the Gap Theory is to put the entire evolutionary process between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1...
Post a Comment
Read more