Skip to main content

Thoughts on Religious words (mindfulness)

Mindfulness is all the rage these days, with large companies like Google and Apple bringing in mindfulness experts. I have also heard of churches and public schools having midweek training in mindfulness. The trouble is that mindfulness is a buddhist word. The buddhist system says that everything is suffering. That suffering is caused by desire. One way that the buddhists claim they can remove desire is through mindfulness training.

Simply put, mindfulness teaches people to focus on the moment. Whatever is right before a person's eyes at that moment has the full focus of the individual. So, if a person is pulling weeds, their full focus must be on that one weed that is being pulled. No thought is given to past weeds or the next weed until this current weed is fully dealt with. Companies us it to teach employees to focus on the current task and not to bounce between tasks or social media and tasks. In this way, they claim, stress will be reduced and peace will be gained, because no thought is given to the next task or the past task. No thought is given to where they will go to lunch or what plans they will have for tonight. The only thing that matters is this moment. Because there is no looking forward or back, all desires disappears and so does the suffering this person is experiencing, that claim.


This teaching is supported and continued by the Zen branch of buddhist. Zen Buddhism is the most mystical type of buddhism. Zen says that suffering comes because we translate and interpret the world through our mind. If we can experience reality apart from our mind, then we have achieved a state where there is no suffering and only bliss, because our mind has been shut off. Mindfulness is the first step in mindlessness. Once a person has mastered focusing on the moment and only that one moment, then to stop that focus and to turn off their mind is an easier task.

The mindfulness experts that come to churches and schools and companies believe with all their heart that all existence is suffering. I believe that this idea needs to be discussed to see if it is true. If it is not true, the the mindfulness exercises are based on a false premise. For the Christian, all existence is not suffering, not even close. There is suffering in life, to be sure, but love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, gentleness, faithfulness and self-control are spirit powered attributes or fruit. There is no suffering in that list and I believe that focusing on this fruit will elevate much of the suffering we bring on ourselves. Worldly desire usually involves envy and jealousy and coveting. Those things are sins and no amount of meditation and focus will atone for those sins. Covering sins with deep breathing exercises is insane. The blood of Jesus is the only atonement for sin. I think Apple and Google and certainly churches should try some Bible study and gospel reading to eleviate stress which is probably based on sin.



#Thoughts on words#

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering the Franklin Day Planner

This week I have been rereading Hyrum Smith's book "The 10 Natural Laws of Productivity and Happiness." This book was written in the late 1980s and I remember reading it for the first time when I was working at Seagate Technologies, after my time in the Air Force. The core tool talked about in the book is the Franklin Day Planner . I remembering having one such planner, long before smart phones and Palm devices. Mine was a leather bound loose-leaf binder with calendar and note pages in it. I kept my daily tasks list and appointments in that binder, which became a record of my work history at Seagate and beyond. The Day Planner binders, pages and supplies were sold at a store called Franklin Quest , which was located at Valco Mall in Sunnyvale. At that time, I was a computer programmer. I was able to keep a record of all request for software, who made the request and when and what the requirements were. It seemed that I was the only one keeping a record of this b...

Thoughts on the Gap theory

The Bible is a closed book.  When God was done writing the Old Testament, he stopped until Matthew.  When he wrote Revelation, he stopped.  There are warnings in the Bible about adding or subtracting words from the Bible. Deuteronomy 4:2 & 12:32 and Revelation 22:18 are the three most specific.  The idea throughout the Bible is that this book is inspired Scripture and people have no right or authority to add to them or take away. This is why the Gap theory is so strange.  People probably feel it would be too obvious to add 16 extra chapters to Romans or Ephesians, so they try and sneak some extra stuff into Genesis.  That is the Gap Theory. The Gap Theory says that there is a space of time between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2.  The space that some people insert is a couple of hundred years all the way up to billions of years.  The most popular use for the Gap Theory is to put the entire evolutionary process between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1...

What do I preach?

I preach the Word of God.  The style I use is called expositional exegetical .  I draw the meaning out of the Scripture and explain it.  I believe this is the only approved type of preaching.  To preach events out of the newspaper or the latest psychology fad does nothing to edify the saints or glorify God and certainly it does not contain the power to save. The context for my preaching is that I preach through books of the Bible.  Most recently I have been preaching through the gospel of John.  I started in John 1:1 and last Sunday I preached through John 21:15-17.  Charles Spurgeon preached through the entire Bible, but did not take the verses in order.  He bounced around, and got through the entire Bible. One of the most popular styles of preaching in large churches or churches that want to be large is a style called “topical.”  Traditionally topical preaching takes a topic that is from the news or something that the pastor is reading....