Skip to main content

Was the Sutherland Springs shooter a “Radical Christian?”

No.   There is no such thing.  There are a couple reasons why:

1. Islam is a political ideology.  Their goal is to replace current governments with the government of Islam.  Therefore their attacks are political in nature.  They are one political system against another.  The current war on terror supported by our government is a war on political terror or people, from Islam, who kill people for political ends.  The shooter in Sutherland Springs had no political agenda.  He was not backed by a political machine or ideology.  The driver in New York was.

2. People who believe in the teachings of Islam believe they are earning points with their god Allah by committing violent acts.  The man who drove the truck down the bike path in New York was attempting, with all his might, to gain points with his god.  His belief was that when he died in the middle of this act of killing, he would be ushered to the highest level of reward in heaven for his great work.  Christianity has no such teaching.  It is impossible to gain “points” with the God of the Bible, therefore no one kills with purely biblical motivations behind them.  People can subvert and twist any teaching and many have killed in the past, in the name of God, but they would be unable to defend their actions from Scripture.  While the driver in New York would have no problem defending his actions from the Q’oran.

As I have taught before, Christianity is different from any other belief or philosophical system.  This is because Christianity is a relationship with the one and true living God.  Anyone can write on a blog that they have become Buddhist.  Most would believe that they are now believing in the four noble truths and following the eight-fold path.  If after a few months they get bored, they can change to Hinduism and follow the writings of the Vedas.  The world and the progressive left thinks that is all religion is.  A philosophy that a person follows for a while and can change at will.

Yet if a person claims to be a follower of Jesus Christ, a true believer in Christ, and a Christian, it is like no other belief system.  A person cannot become a Christian unless God the Father draws them and gives them to Christ.  When that happens, that person becomes a new creation, a new creature.  The old has been removed.  They have moved from death to life, from alienated to adopted.  All their sins are forgiven and atoned for.  Nothing like this, nothing close to this happens with any other belief system.

If a person is truly saved, from God’s point of view, not ours, they would never shoot up a church.  Granted there is mental illness, substance abuse and other chemical issues that change the thinking of a true Christian.  Yet no true believing Christian, in their right mind, would claim that Christ is the motivation for violence.  Yet the world does not understand this.  Many will come to Christ in the last day claiming the name Christian, and he will say he never knew them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts on the 2017 iPhones

Apple released the iPhone 8 a week or so ago.  Apple will release the iPhone X on November 3, 2017.  This is part of Apple’s current annual release of updated phones with better screens, more battery life and a better processor.  I bought my iPhone 7 plus on release day in September of 2016.  I went to the Apple store and bought it.  When thinking about whether I need to update my phone this year, I need to consider a few things. First, is my phone functional or did I break it?  My phone is in good working order.  The screen is not cracked, the non-existent home button still works.  Volume and power and silent switches work.  Mechanically the phone is in good shape.  It took the IOS 11 and IOS 11.01 updates without a problem. The next question is this:  what do I use my phone for and will a faster phone with a better screen help me do these things? Podcasts:  I listen to many podcasts on my phone.  I listen to a mix ...

Thoughts on Father Brown

There is a show on the BBC that is on American Netflix called Father Brown.  It takes place in 1955 in England, so World War II is still fresh in their minds.  Father brown was in the infantry in  World War I, then became a priest and was a chaplain in World War II.  Now he is an overweight, blading, gentle priest in a small British town. The humor of each episode is that when a crime occurs, the police are notified and Father Brown is usually already there for some other reason.  So Father brown gets involved.  The police jump to conclusions, arrest the wrong person and Father Brown, amateur sleuth, pokes around and figures out the truth and the police look foolish. Once he was arrested for obstruction of justice, during his time in the jail, he figured out who sabotaged the town race and solved the crime.  The district police gave him a commendation, so now the local police tolerate him better. In this show, having a priest as a main character ...

Thoughts on the tactics of war

Back in the day, during World War I and World War II in America, and back to the beginning of recorded time in the rest of the world, there has been a war tactic that is based on dehumanizing the enemy. It is also called objectifying the enemy. This philosophy teaches soldiers that the enemy is not human, and therefore deserves to be slaughtered. After all, dangerous animals are to be slaughtered. During World War II, posters on Army bases would depict Germans and Japanese as sub-human to condition soldiers to dehumanize the enemy and kill without conscious. Since soldiers were convinced the enemies were sub-human (by the way, this happened on all sides during World War II, it was not just the Americans) then soldiers could do anything to win. Today, Hezbollah and Hamas actually have nursery rhymes teaching the young children that the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, drinks blood and grinds up children for his breakfast. This is taught from a very young age, i...