Skip to main content

Thoughts on Brainwashing

Brainwashing is bad, right? We remember movies and stories like the Manchurian candidate where a high level official is brainwashed by a foreign government and the victim will be activated when it is most advantageous. Brainwashing is when people are convinced of something through torture or prolonged exposure so that they will consider this false idea as fact. People may have been brainwashed in P.O.W. camps to think their captors were good people. Stockholm syndrome is where prisons come to love their captors in a form of brainwashing. So generally speaking, most everyone would agree that brainwashing is bad.

That is, unless you are brainwashing people to believe something you consider true. For example, if a political party runs news stories and opinion pieces and commentaries and advertisements that portray a particular candidate as evil. Eventually some people will come to believe what is being said about this candidate, that they are evil. On one hand we could say that these people were brainwashed through prolonged exposure to certain ideas. Or we might say that these people have finally been convinced of the truth. It is not brainwashing if I am right and I am educating you in the truth, or is it.

Politics works this way and so do most religions. For a believer of a religion, to tell someone, educate someone and convince someone of their beliefs is not brainwashing, it is enlightenment. A person is not brainwashed, they have been encouraged to see the light. But if a bad religion causes someone to see the light, a deprogrammer might be hired to help them out of this brainwashing. Brainwashing, therefore, is in the eye of the beholder, it seems.

Groups of people are formed when common beliefs are discovered. These groups can be formal, like a political party or a church, or it can be informal, like a gathering of friends. People tend to gravitate to people who believe similar things to themselves. Facebook friends, twitter followers and other social constructs are used as boundaries of people who believe similarly. They may not share all beliefs in common, but the beliefs important to the group are shared. For example, people sho go to the same church may not share the same preferences in cars, or food or ice cream flavor, but the core belief in Jesus Christ is what is necessary to bring them together. All other beliefs can be ignored if the important beliefs are common.

And so to convince someone of your core beliefs, you educate, indoctrinate, tell and share, and even brainwash. We may not be reduced to water boarding or solitary confinement, but if we can convince someone of our beliefs and they agree and join us, that is a win. Then week after week we teach, convince and brainwash people into believing the same way we do. If we are in the truth, then it is good we convince people in the truth. It is only brainwashing if we are teaching something false, right?

#Thoughts on Brainwshing#

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts on the 2017 iPhones

Apple released the iPhone 8 a week or so ago.  Apple will release the iPhone X on November 3, 2017.  This is part of Apple’s current annual release of updated phones with better screens, more battery life and a better processor.  I bought my iPhone 7 plus on release day in September of 2016.  I went to the Apple store and bought it.  When thinking about whether I need to update my phone this year, I need to consider a few things. First, is my phone functional or did I break it?  My phone is in good working order.  The screen is not cracked, the non-existent home button still works.  Volume and power and silent switches work.  Mechanically the phone is in good shape.  It took the IOS 11 and IOS 11.01 updates without a problem. The next question is this:  what do I use my phone for and will a faster phone with a better screen help me do these things? Podcasts:  I listen to many podcasts on my phone.  I listen to a mix ...

Thoughts on Father Brown

There is a show on the BBC that is on American Netflix called Father Brown.  It takes place in 1955 in England, so World War II is still fresh in their minds.  Father brown was in the infantry in  World War I, then became a priest and was a chaplain in World War II.  Now he is an overweight, blading, gentle priest in a small British town. The humor of each episode is that when a crime occurs, the police are notified and Father Brown is usually already there for some other reason.  So Father brown gets involved.  The police jump to conclusions, arrest the wrong person and Father Brown, amateur sleuth, pokes around and figures out the truth and the police look foolish. Once he was arrested for obstruction of justice, during his time in the jail, he figured out who sabotaged the town race and solved the crime.  The district police gave him a commendation, so now the local police tolerate him better. In this show, having a priest as a main character ...

Church Regulation in California

The first part of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States reads Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; Everyone always jumps to the second and third and fourth part of this amendment  and screams about freedom of speech or the freedom of the press.  However, the reason the original people came to America was to get away from religious persecution.  Therefore, the first protection against the government (which is what the amendments are), is about freedom of religion. In California there is a move, ever since 2010 the reduced the number of churches.  Actually, they don’t care if two people meet in a home and call it a church, they want to remove the large church meeting buildings.  This is because church buildings do not pay property or use tax.  Many churches in California, especially in the San Francisco Bay Area, have been in their current location for a cen...