Skip to main content

Thoughts on Brainwashing

Brainwashing is bad, right? We remember movies and stories like the Manchurian candidate where a high level official is brainwashed by a foreign government and the victim will be activated when it is most advantageous. Brainwashing is when people are convinced of something through torture or prolonged exposure so that they will consider this false idea as fact. People may have been brainwashed in P.O.W. camps to think their captors were good people. Stockholm syndrome is where prisons come to love their captors in a form of brainwashing. So generally speaking, most everyone would agree that brainwashing is bad.

That is, unless you are brainwashing people to believe something you consider true. For example, if a political party runs news stories and opinion pieces and commentaries and advertisements that portray a particular candidate as evil. Eventually some people will come to believe what is being said about this candidate, that they are evil. On one hand we could say that these people were brainwashed through prolonged exposure to certain ideas. Or we might say that these people have finally been convinced of the truth. It is not brainwashing if I am right and I am educating you in the truth, or is it.

Politics works this way and so do most religions. For a believer of a religion, to tell someone, educate someone and convince someone of their beliefs is not brainwashing, it is enlightenment. A person is not brainwashed, they have been encouraged to see the light. But if a bad religion causes someone to see the light, a deprogrammer might be hired to help them out of this brainwashing. Brainwashing, therefore, is in the eye of the beholder, it seems.

Groups of people are formed when common beliefs are discovered. These groups can be formal, like a political party or a church, or it can be informal, like a gathering of friends. People tend to gravitate to people who believe similar things to themselves. Facebook friends, twitter followers and other social constructs are used as boundaries of people who believe similarly. They may not share all beliefs in common, but the beliefs important to the group are shared. For example, people sho go to the same church may not share the same preferences in cars, or food or ice cream flavor, but the core belief in Jesus Christ is what is necessary to bring them together. All other beliefs can be ignored if the important beliefs are common.

And so to convince someone of your core beliefs, you educate, indoctrinate, tell and share, and even brainwash. We may not be reduced to water boarding or solitary confinement, but if we can convince someone of our beliefs and they agree and join us, that is a win. Then week after week we teach, convince and brainwash people into believing the same way we do. If we are in the truth, then it is good we convince people in the truth. It is only brainwashing if we are teaching something false, right?

#Thoughts on Brainwshing#

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering the Franklin Day Planner

This week I have been rereading Hyrum Smith's book "The 10 Natural Laws of Productivity and Happiness." This book was written in the late 1980s and I remember reading it for the first time when I was working at Seagate Technologies, after my time in the Air Force. The core tool talked about in the book is the Franklin Day Planner . I remembering having one such planner, long before smart phones and Palm devices. Mine was a leather bound loose-leaf binder with calendar and note pages in it. I kept my daily tasks list and appointments in that binder, which became a record of my work history at Seagate and beyond. The Day Planner binders, pages and supplies were sold at a store called Franklin Quest , which was located at Valco Mall in Sunnyvale. At that time, I was a computer programmer. I was able to keep a record of all request for software, who made the request and when and what the requirements were. It seemed that I was the only one keeping a record of this b...

What do I preach?

I preach the Word of God.  The style I use is called expositional exegetical .  I draw the meaning out of the Scripture and explain it.  I believe this is the only approved type of preaching.  To preach events out of the newspaper or the latest psychology fad does nothing to edify the saints or glorify God and certainly it does not contain the power to save. The context for my preaching is that I preach through books of the Bible.  Most recently I have been preaching through the gospel of John.  I started in John 1:1 and last Sunday I preached through John 21:15-17.  Charles Spurgeon preached through the entire Bible, but did not take the verses in order.  He bounced around, and got through the entire Bible. One of the most popular styles of preaching in large churches or churches that want to be large is a style called “topical.”  Traditionally topical preaching takes a topic that is from the news or something that the pastor is reading....

Thoughts on the 2017 iPhones

Apple released the iPhone 8 a week or so ago.  Apple will release the iPhone X on November 3, 2017.  This is part of Apple’s current annual release of updated phones with better screens, more battery life and a better processor.  I bought my iPhone 7 plus on release day in September of 2016.  I went to the Apple store and bought it.  When thinking about whether I need to update my phone this year, I need to consider a few things. First, is my phone functional or did I break it?  My phone is in good working order.  The screen is not cracked, the non-existent home button still works.  Volume and power and silent switches work.  Mechanically the phone is in good shape.  It took the IOS 11 and IOS 11.01 updates without a problem. The next question is this:  what do I use my phone for and will a faster phone with a better screen help me do these things? Podcasts:  I listen to many podcasts on my phone.  I listen to a mix ...