Skip to main content

Thoughts on the tactics of war

Back in the day, during World War I and World War II in America, and back to the beginning of recorded time in the rest of the world, there has been a war tactic that is based on dehumanizing the enemy. It is also called objectifying the enemy. This philosophy teaches soldiers that the enemy is not human, and therefore deserves to be slaughtered. After all, dangerous animals are to be slaughtered. During World War II, posters on Army bases would depict Germans and Japanese as sub-human to condition soldiers to dehumanize the enemy and kill without conscious. Since soldiers were convinced the enemies were sub-human (by the way, this happened on all sides during World War II, it was not just the Americans) then soldiers could do anything to win.

Today, Hezbollah and Hamas actually have nursery rhymes teaching the young children that the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, drinks blood and grinds up children for his breakfast. This is taught from a very young age, in cartoons on TV and in comic books, Dehumanizing Jews, so when rockets are shot into residential areas of Israel, there is no moral evil, because Jews are animals.

Armies have been doing this since there were armies. When the Assyrians marched across the world, slaughtering everything that moved, they were able to do this because they viewed the rest of the world as less than themselves. The Babylonians did it, the Greeks did it, the Romans did and most armies today do it. America has gotten off that train because it is not politically correct. World War II posters would be considered racist today.

Instead we, in America, have moved this into the political arena. During the election of 2016, people became very angry at the candidates. Usually the candidates on the other side, but not always. When Hillary Clinton lost, it seems like all the stops were removed to fight against and destroy Donald Trump. I understand political discord, but it is improper to dehumanize the opponent in politics.

The most recent activity involved Kathy Gifford holding the severed head of Donald Trump. The media exploded. Some thinking it was funny and good (because Donald Trump had been dehumanized) and others were horrified. Now the discussion surrounds Trump’s son, Barron who is 11, and apparently he was traumatized by this. In response to that, a news commentator said that if Barron saw a pile of rotting baloney with a tie, he would think it was his dad.

When the enemy is dehumanized, there are not rules. Everything is permitted. The right has dehumanized Hillary Clinton and the left has dehumanized Donald Trump. Because of this we have moved our of political rhetoric and have moved into nasty, bottom of the barrel warfare. "Antifa" believes that violence, property destruction and even murder is allowed to promote their ends. This is dangerous. Political correctness has removed dehumanizing the enemy out of warfare and moved it into the political arena where anything goes, people are getting hurt and people are dying.



#Thoughts on war#

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering the Franklin Day Planner

This week I have been rereading Hyrum Smith's book "The 10 Natural Laws of Productivity and Happiness." This book was written in the late 1980s and I remember reading it for the first time when I was working at Seagate Technologies, after my time in the Air Force. The core tool talked about in the book is the Franklin Day Planner . I remembering having one such planner, long before smart phones and Palm devices. Mine was a leather bound loose-leaf binder with calendar and note pages in it. I kept my daily tasks list and appointments in that binder, which became a record of my work history at Seagate and beyond. The Day Planner binders, pages and supplies were sold at a store called Franklin Quest , which was located at Valco Mall in Sunnyvale. At that time, I was a computer programmer. I was able to keep a record of all request for software, who made the request and when and what the requirements were. It seemed that I was the only one keeping a record of this b...

Thoughts on the Gap theory

The Bible is a closed book.  When God was done writing the Old Testament, he stopped until Matthew.  When he wrote Revelation, he stopped.  There are warnings in the Bible about adding or subtracting words from the Bible. Deuteronomy 4:2 & 12:32 and Revelation 22:18 are the three most specific.  The idea throughout the Bible is that this book is inspired Scripture and people have no right or authority to add to them or take away. This is why the Gap theory is so strange.  People probably feel it would be too obvious to add 16 extra chapters to Romans or Ephesians, so they try and sneak some extra stuff into Genesis.  That is the Gap Theory. The Gap Theory says that there is a space of time between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2.  The space that some people insert is a couple of hundred years all the way up to billions of years.  The most popular use for the Gap Theory is to put the entire evolutionary process between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1...

What do I preach?

I preach the Word of God.  The style I use is called expositional exegetical .  I draw the meaning out of the Scripture and explain it.  I believe this is the only approved type of preaching.  To preach events out of the newspaper or the latest psychology fad does nothing to edify the saints or glorify God and certainly it does not contain the power to save. The context for my preaching is that I preach through books of the Bible.  Most recently I have been preaching through the gospel of John.  I started in John 1:1 and last Sunday I preached through John 21:15-17.  Charles Spurgeon preached through the entire Bible, but did not take the verses in order.  He bounced around, and got through the entire Bible. One of the most popular styles of preaching in large churches or churches that want to be large is a style called “topical.”  Traditionally topical preaching takes a topic that is from the news or something that the pastor is reading....